Juan Pablo,

me too agreed on all points.
I had a look at the draft, and have no further comments.

kind regards,
Harry


2012/4/19 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <[email protected]>

> Hello all,
>
> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
>
> 6 Binding +1 votes
> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> 0 +0 votes
> 1 Binding -1 votes
> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
>
> Binding +1 votes from:
> Andrew Jaquith
> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> Florian Holeczek
> Harry Metske
> Dirk Frederecick
> Janne Jalkannen
>
> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> Michael Gerzabek
> Christophe Dupriez
> Jürgen Weber
> Siegfried Goeschl
> Luca Gilardoni
>
> Binding -1 votes from:
> Sam Ruby
>
> Non-binding -1 from:
> Ross Gardler
>
> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
>
> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
>
> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although
> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
>
> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> graduation.
>
> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The
> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we
> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more
> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
>
> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is
> the general feeling.
>
> My suggested steps would be:
> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
> way
> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> some mock-ups on this)
> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval,
> proceed with IPMC vote
>
> So, what do you think?
>
>
> regards,
> juan pablo
>
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [2]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>

Reply via email to