great! :-) I'm adding a changes.txt file with the JIRA issues for that version and then run a vote on releasing 2.9.0-incubating-0
regards, juan pablo On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]>wrote: > > The svn tag is jspwiki_2_9_0 and the signed release artifacts are at > > http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/ > > /Janne > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 16:06 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk > > > > > > thanks heaps! :-) > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > >> What's the svn tag? > >> > >> /Janne > >> > >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into > the > >>> WOT", which currently I don't have. > >>> > >>> I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as > >>> 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc > >> of > >>> JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-) > >>> > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> juan pablo > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen > >>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache > web-of-trust. > >>>> > >>>> /Janne > >>>> > >>>> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Juan Pablo, > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree with you in every point of your mail. > >>>>> > >>>>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give > >>>> notice if anything was incorrect. > >>>>> > >>>>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join > the > >>>> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn > >>>> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to > >> instructions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Florian > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <[email protected]> > >>>>> An: [email protected] > >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20 > >>>>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello all, > >>>>> > >>>>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are: > >>>>> > >>>>> 6 Binding +1 votes > >>>>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes > >>>>> 0 +0 votes > >>>>> 1 Binding -1 votes > >>>>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes > >>>>> > >>>>> Binding +1 votes from: > >>>>> Andrew Jaquith > >>>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez > >>>>> Florian Holeczek > >>>>> Harry Metske > >>>>> Dirk Frederecick > >>>>> Janne Jalkannen > >>>>> > >>>>> Non-binding +1 votes from: > >>>>> Michael Gerzabek > >>>>> Christophe Dupriez > >>>>> Jürgen Weber > >>>>> Siegfried Goeschl > >>>>> Luca Gilardoni > >>>>> > >>>>> Binding -1 votes from: > >>>>> Sam Ruby > >>>>> > >>>>> Non-binding -1 from: > >>>>> Ross Gardler > >>>>> > >>>>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2] > >>>>> > >>>>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT: > >>>>> > >>>>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, > >>>> although > >>>>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting > >> until > >>>>> these issues have been fixed, namely: > >>>>> a) making (at least) one apache official release, > >>>>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution > >>>>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site, > >>>>> > >>>>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards > >>>>> graduation. > >>>>> > >>>>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to > >>>>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as > passed. > >>>> The > >>>>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, > once > >>>> we > >>>>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning > >> the > >>>>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache > >>>>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 > were > >>>>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither > >>>>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they > were > >>>> more > >>>>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases". > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through > >>>>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know > which > >>>> is > >>>>> the general feeling. > >>>>> > >>>>> My suggested steps would be: > >>>>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the > >> ASF > >>>>> way > >>>>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already > have > >>>>> some mock-ups on this) > >>>>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or > changes > >>>>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538 > >>>>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on > >>>> approval, > >>>>> proceed with IPMC vote > >>>>> > >>>>> So, what do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> juan pablo > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>>> > >>>>> [2] > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
