The svn tag is jspwiki_2_9_0 and the signed release artifacts are at http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
/Janne On Apr 22, 2012, at 16:06 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk > > > thanks heaps! :-) > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> What's the svn tag? >> >> /Janne >> >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the >>> WOT", which currently I don't have. >>> >>> I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as >>> 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc >> of >>> JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-) >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> juan pablo >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790 >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust. >>>> >>>> /Janne >>>> >>>> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Juan Pablo, >>>>> >>>>> I agree with you in every point of your mail. >>>>> >>>>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give >>>> notice if anything was incorrect. >>>>> >>>>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the >>>> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn >>>> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to >> instructions. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Florian >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <[email protected]> >>>>> An: [email protected] >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20 >>>>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation >>>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are: >>>>> >>>>> 6 Binding +1 votes >>>>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes >>>>> 0 +0 votes >>>>> 1 Binding -1 votes >>>>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes >>>>> >>>>> Binding +1 votes from: >>>>> Andrew Jaquith >>>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >>>>> Florian Holeczek >>>>> Harry Metske >>>>> Dirk Frederecick >>>>> Janne Jalkannen >>>>> >>>>> Non-binding +1 votes from: >>>>> Michael Gerzabek >>>>> Christophe Dupriez >>>>> Jürgen Weber >>>>> Siegfried Goeschl >>>>> Luca Gilardoni >>>>> >>>>> Binding -1 votes from: >>>>> Sam Ruby >>>>> >>>>> Non-binding -1 from: >>>>> Ross Gardler >>>>> >>>>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2] >>>>> >>>>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT: >>>>> >>>>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, >>>> although >>>>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting >> until >>>>> these issues have been fixed, namely: >>>>> a) making (at least) one apache official release, >>>>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution >>>>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site, >>>>> >>>>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards >>>>> graduation. >>>>> >>>>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to >>>>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. >>>> The >>>>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once >>>> we >>>>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning >> the >>>>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache >>>>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were >>>>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither >>>>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were >>>> more >>>>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases". >>>>> >>>>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through >>>>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which >>>> is >>>>> the general feeling. >>>>> >>>>> My suggested steps would be: >>>>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the >> ASF >>>>> way >>>>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have >>>>> some mock-ups on this) >>>>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes >>>>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538 >>>>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on >>>> approval, >>>>> proceed with IPMC vote >>>>> >>>>> So, what do you think? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> juan pablo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>>>> >>>>> [2] >>>>> >>>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>>> >>>> >> >>
