If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust. /Janne
On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote: > Hi Juan Pablo, > > I agree with you in every point of your mail. > > @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give notice > if anything was incorrect. > > Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the > Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn > repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to instructions. > > Regards > Florian > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20 > Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation > > Hello all, > > 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are: > > 6 Binding +1 votes > 5 Non-binding +1 votes > 0 +0 votes > 1 Binding -1 votes > 1 Non-binding -1 votes > > Binding +1 votes from: > Andrew Jaquith > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez > Florian Holeczek > Harry Metske > Dirk Frederecick > Janne Jalkannen > > Non-binding +1 votes from: > Michael Gerzabek > Christophe Dupriez > Jürgen Weber > Siegfried Goeschl > Luca Gilardoni > > Binding -1 votes from: > Sam Ruby > > Non-binding -1 from: > Ross Gardler > > Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2] > > Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT: > > Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although > they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until > these issues have been fixed, namely: > a) making (at least) one apache official release, > b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution > c) tidying up the project's incubator site, > > The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards > graduation. > > So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to > general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The > only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we > have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the > [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache > guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were > released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither > distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more > to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases". > > I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through > graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is > the general feeling. > > My suggested steps would be: > - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF > way > - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have > some mock-ups on this) > - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes > during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538 > - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval, > proceed with IPMC vote > > So, what do you think? > > > regards, > juan pablo > > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > [2] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
