My only problem with `=` vs `in` is that even the base julia code is inconsistent! Looking at one file ( I can't remember which now) it had both i = 1:nr and i in 1:n Again this was in the same file! Please tell me I am not being pedantic when I saw this and thought this must be fixed if even the base is being inconsistent.
On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 8:44:03 AM UTC-4, mschauer wrote: > > Do we want to give up on this topic? Then we should do so in an earnest > way and close the case with a clear message, ideally after > establishing if we want to add a style recommendation about the use of > ``=`` and ``in`` to > http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/style-guide/. Currently > the manual states in the control-flow chapter "In general, the for loop > construct can iterate over any container. In these cases, the alternative > (but fully equivalent) keyword in is typically used instead of =, since > it makes the code read more clearly." >
