Hei ok.. for changing. I think people should be aware that if they select they also can change - otherwise they would go the save way of creating a new layer - which contains "real" copies (no link).
A thought: As I am not sure if people utilize that class already - it may be wise to create a second constructor that takes the boolean value. The original one will set the boolean value to a default which represents the current "how to"? stefan Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I looked at the source code after considering everyone's comments. > After looking at the code I realize this isn't really a bug fix, it is > more of a behavior modification. Since this is the case, I thought I > would ask here before I make any changes. > > I can modify the SpatialExecutorPlugIn to create a "normal" selection > if the user doesn't NOT choose to place the selection in a new layer, > but to clone features if they choose to put the selection in a new > layer. To do this I'll need to modify the constructor of the > SpatialQueryExecutor class to accept a boolean parameter indicating > the users choice. At this current time that boolean value is stored in > the SpatialQueryPlugIn class, and the SpatialQueryExecutor doesn't > have access to it. The SpatialQueryExecutor needs access to this > boolean parameter if it is to behave in the way I describe. > > It won't take me long to make and test this change. A couple of hours > at the most. > > I will move forward if we can agree that the plug-in behavior should > be modified as I describe. > > SS > > P.S. - Thanks goes to Stefan, Edgar, and Michael for helping me figure > this "bug" out. :] > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Sunburned Surveyor > <sunburned.surve...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the clarification Stefan and Michael. I now understand that >> it is only possible to "copy" features from the selection, and not to >> "cut" them, as I had thought. I will look at the code today on my >> lunch break to see what can be done about this. >> >> Landon >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, <edgar.sol...@web.de> wrote: >>>> (1) in fact, I'm not sure if having the same feature in several layers >>>> (without clone) is a good or a dangerous idea. I think it could be nice >>>> to have a kind of "view" (like in database) to be able to work easily on >>>> a small part of a large featurecollection or to apply different styles >>>> to a featureCollection without cloning objects... >>>> >>> This might confuse users, but also helps to save memory ... maybe enable >>> this as a choice for advanced users? >>> Of course every change in on layer changes all instances in every other >>> layer, but this may be on purpose. >>> >>> regards ede >>> >>>> Sunburned Surveyor a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Before I examined the source code for the spatial query bug, I decided >>>>> to see if I could duplicate the incorrect behavior. >>>>> >>>>> I was not able to do this. >>>>> >>>>> I successfully executed a spatial query and was able to copy & cut the >>>>> resulting selection from the source layer, pasting the selected >>>>> features to a destination layer. >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone else been able to duplicate this bug? As far as I can tell, >>>>> the selections created by the spatial query tool behave like all other >>>>> JUMP selections. >>>>> >>>>> If someone can confirm this isn't a real bug, I will close the bug >>>>> report. In this case, I will take a look at the other bug that Stefan >>>>> mentioned. >>>>> >>>>> The Sunburned Surveyor >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Sunburned Surveyor >>>>> <sunburned.surve...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I meant to say "check with you on the desired behavior of the plug-in"... >>>>>> >>>>>> SS >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Sunburned Surveyor >>>>>> <sunburned.surve...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the help Stefan. I hope to start work on this bug next >>>>>>> week. I may need to check on the desired behavior of the plug-in again >>>>>>> after I have looked at the code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hei, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so I just had to check... it is the plugin: >>>>>>>> ui.plugin.analysis.SpatialQueryPlugIn of the original JUMP >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the case where the selection is needed is for instance if feature in >>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>> layer appear also in a second layer and one wants to find those using >>>>>>>> "equal". >>>>>>>> Then the goal would be to delete or modify the features that appear in >>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>> layers (e.g. "cut selected items" doesn't work) - I attach two >>>>>>>> datasets. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> stefan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is the link to the bug tracker page for the bug I am talking >>>>>>>>> about: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2660272&group_id=118054&atid=679906 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SS >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Sunburned Surveyor >>>>>>>>> <sunburned.surve...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will start work on squishing the bug that has to do with "phantom" >>>>>>>>>> feature selections produced by the spatial query functionality in >>>>>>>>>> OpenJUMP. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me if the spatial query functionality is part of the >>>>>>>>>> core program, or part of a plug-in? That will help me track down the >>>>>>>>>> source code so I can get started. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> SS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >>>>>>>>> Francisco, >>>>>>>>> CA >>>>>>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>>>>>>>> Enterprise >>>>>>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>>>>>>>> participation >>>>>>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >>>>>>>>> code: >>>>>>>>> SFAD >>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >>>>>>>> Francisco, CA >>>>>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>>>>>>> Enterprise >>>>>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>>>>>>> participation >>>>>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >>>>>>>> code: SFAD >>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, >>>>> CA >>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>>>> Enterprise >>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>>>> participation >>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: >>>>> SFAD >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, >>>> CA >>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>>> Enterprise >>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>>> participation >>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: >>>> SFAD >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA >>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise >>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation >>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
