Here is ours on 9.6R1.3, two full feeds, approx 500 logical interfaces
inet.0: 305813 destinations, 604735 routes (305813 active, 0 holddown, 1
hidden)
Routing Engine status:
Temperature 19 degrees C / 66 degrees F
CPU temperature 16 degrees C / 60 degrees F
DRAM 768 MB
Memory utilization 95 percent
Model RE-5.0
Start time 2009-10-02 20:21:49 CDT
Uptime 124 days, 15 hours, 52 minutes, 58
seconds
Last reboot reason Router rebooted after a normal shutdown.
Load averages: 1 minute 5 minute 15 minute
0.00 0.00 0.00
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
We have 4 M7i's with RE-400's and 768M RAM and have never had a problem with
taking full routes (we are at 55% memory usage right now).
With all of the comments on this topic, should we be worried?
What JunOS version are you running?
This is an M7i with RE-400, a full Internet routing table,
inet.0: 314795 destinations, 629302 routes (314784 active, 0 holddown, 19
hidden)
a handfull of MPLS L3VPNs (around 3K routes here) and a few interfaces,
running JunOS 9.5R3.7. Memory usage:
Routing Engine status:
Temperature 33 degrees C / 91 degrees F
CPU temperature 30 degrees C / 86 degrees F
DRAM 768 MB
Memory utilization 94 percent
Model RE-5.0
I'd say *any* RE-400 box with a full routing table and a recent JunOS
version is reason for worry. We have been unpleasantly surprised a
few times (boxes starting to show swap usage).
Our units push ~200Mbit traffic, so they are nowhere near capacity CPU wise.
Packet forwarding is done in hardware on this platform, the CPU is not
involved.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
