Hello, eBGP shouldn't come into play here. Your physical interfaces are bundled as 1 logical interface (ae0). Load balancing over L3 LAG interfaces works the same as ECMP links. You have to configure this:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/policy-configuring-per-packet-load-balancing.html Stefan has suggested this below. Have you tried it?. Can you post your relevant config? What I find weird is you do have some egress traffic on both physical links. It's just not even close to being balanced. Without any load balancing configs, I would expect to see 0 bps on one link. Do you have enough flows? If most of your traffic is generated from just a few flows, you may not be able to get much better. Serge ----- Original Message ---- From: Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> To: mail-list <mohan.nand...@gmail.com> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; uniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 1:20:33 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos Stefan, This configuration has no effect, because the connection (PE x CE) uses EBGP routing within the VRF dados. What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces of RT110, you have any other suggestions? Thanks Gabriel Farias 2010/4/5 mail-list <mohan.nand...@gmail.com> > try this and see if it makes any difference... > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip > or > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-2 > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Gabriel Farias > <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Stefan, >> >> Any suggestions to correct this imbalance? >> >> Thanks, >> Gabriel Farias >> >> 2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> >> >> > Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration: >> > >> > *Interfaces*: >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0 >> > description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001"; >> > gigether-options { >> > 802.3ad ae0; >> > } >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/3 >> > description "*BA* G1/47 - SW001"; >> > gigether-options { >> > 802.3ad ae0; >> > } >> > show configuration interfaces ae0 >> > description "*BA* Po150 - SW001"; >> > mtu 9192; >> > unit 0 { >> > family inet { >> > address 10.251.40.53/30; >> > } >> > } >> > >> > *VRF instances*: >> > show configuration routing-instances dados >> > instance-type vrf; >> > interface ae0.0; >> > ... >> > protocols { >> > bgp { >> > group PEER-SW001 { >> > type external; >> > hold-time 30; >> > peer-as 65100; >> > as-override; >> > neighbor 10.251.40.54; >> > } >> > } >> > >> > What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces, >> see >> > that is constant unbalance >> > >> > {master} >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate >> > Input rate : 271677184 bps (69055 pps) >> > Output rate : 37802544 bps (10429 pps) >> > >> > {master} >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate >> > Input rate : 293302512 bps (61095 pps) >> > Output rate : 628471504 bps (134276 pps) >> > >> > {master} >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate >> > Input rate : 298597864 bps (70456 pps) >> > Output rate : 34856992 bps (8756 pps) >> > >> > {master} >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate >> > Input rate : 288075200 bps (57232 pps) >> > Output rate : 657782056 bps (129224 pps) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> > >> >> I'm sorry, your request is getting lost in translation. Why don't you >> just >> >> show us your configs and do a 'show route x.x.x.x' and 'show route >> >> forwarding-table destination x.x.x.x' for the route you are trying to >> >> load-balance. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> Stefan Fouant >> >> >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> >> >> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300 >> >> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> >> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; < >> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >> > >> >> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> >> >> I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120) >> >> >> >> Reagards, >> >> Gabriel Farias >> >> >> >> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> >> >> >>> Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions? >> >>> >> >>> Stefan Fouant >> >>> >> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >>> ------------------------------ >> >>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> >> >>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:32:18 -0300 >> >>> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> >>> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; < >> >>> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> >> >>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >>> >> >>> I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical connections >> >>> (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the Junos >> uses >> >>> the default flow. >> >>> >> >>> I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced way, >> the >> >>> previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration >> >>> routing-instance <name> not have all the options. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> Gabriel Farias >> >>> >> >>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> >> >>> >> >>>> You need the following: >> >>>> >> >>>> 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' >> >>>> >> >>>> and >> >>>> >> >>>> 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-balance >> >>>> per-packet' >> >>>> >> >>>> Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry. >> >>>> >> >>>> HTHs. >> >>>> >> >>>> Stefan Fouant >> >>>> ------Original Message------ >> >>>> From: Gabriel Farias >> >>>> Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net >> >>>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >>>> Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi members, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x >> Cisco >> >>>> 6509 >> >>>> (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with >> the >> >>>> output unbalanced traffic. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> configuration forwarding-options >> >>>> >> >>>> load-balance { >> >>>> indexed-next-hop; >> >>>> } >> >>>> hash-key { >> >>>> family inet { >> >>>> layer-3; >> >>>> layer-4; >> >>>> } >> >>>> } >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> >> >>>> Gabriel Farias >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp __________________________________________________________________ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp