Hi, I configured the router the suggested parameters in URL:
{master}[edit] RT110# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance term 1 { then { load-balance per-packet; } } RT110# show routing-options forwarding-table { export load-balance; } RT110# show forwarding-options load-balance { indexed-next-hop; } hash-key { family inet { layer-3; layer-4; } } The continuing imbalance in the physical interfaces: {master}[edit] RT110# run show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate Input rate: 520010728 bps (98183 pps) Output rate: 585910320 bps (176371 pps) {master}[edit] RT110# run show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate Input rate: 621317752 bps (107767 pps) Output rate: 107517264 bps (17319 pps) The configuration is correct? Or we would have to configure within the routing-instances dados. Thanks Gabriel Farias 2010/4/5 Serge Vautour <sergevaut...@yahoo.ca> > Hello, > > eBGP shouldn't come into play here. Your physical interfaces are bundled as > 1 logical interface (ae0). Load balancing over L3 LAG interfaces works the > same as ECMP links. You have to configure this: > > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/policy-configuring-per-packet-load-balancing.html > > Stefan has suggested this below. Have you tried it?. Can you post your > relevant config? > > What I find weird is you do have some egress traffic on both physical > links. It's just not even close to being balanced. Without any load > balancing configs, I would expect to see 0 bps on one link. Do you have > enough flows? If most of your traffic is generated from just a few flows, > you may not be able to get much better. > > Serge > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> > To: mail-list <mohan.nand...@gmail.com> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; uniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 1:20:33 PM > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > > Stefan, > > This configuration has no effect, because the connection (PE x CE) uses > EBGP > routing within the VRF dados. > > What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces of > RT110, you have any other suggestions? > > Thanks > Gabriel Farias > > > > 2010/4/5 mail-list <mohan.nand...@gmail.com> > > > try this and see if it makes any difference... > > > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip > > or > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-2 > > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Gabriel Farias < > gabrielfaria...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Stefan, > >> > >> Any suggestions to correct this imbalance? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Gabriel Farias > >> > >> 2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration: > >> > > >> > *Interfaces*: > >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0 > >> > description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001"; > >> > gigether-options { > >> > 802.3ad ae0; > >> > } > >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/3 > >> > description "*BA* G1/47 - SW001"; > >> > gigether-options { > >> > 802.3ad ae0; > >> > } > >> > show configuration interfaces ae0 > >> > description "*BA* Po150 - SW001"; > >> > mtu 9192; > >> > unit 0 { > >> > family inet { > >> > address 10.251.40.53/30; > >> > } > >> > } > >> > > >> > *VRF instances*: > >> > show configuration routing-instances dados > >> > instance-type vrf; > >> > interface ae0.0; > >> > ... > >> > protocols { > >> > bgp { > >> > group PEER-SW001 { > >> > type external; > >> > hold-time 30; > >> > peer-as 65100; > >> > as-override; > >> > neighbor 10.251.40.54; > >> > } > >> > } > >> > > >> > What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces, > >> see > >> > that is constant unbalance > >> > > >> > {master} > >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate > >> > Input rate : 271677184 bps (69055 pps) > >> > Output rate : 37802544 bps (10429 pps) > >> > > >> > {master} > >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate > >> > Input rate : 293302512 bps (61095 pps) > >> > Output rate : 628471504 bps (134276 pps) > >> > > >> > {master} > >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate > >> > Input rate : 298597864 bps (70456 pps) > >> > Output rate : 34856992 bps (8756 pps) > >> > > >> > {master} > >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate > >> > Input rate : 288075200 bps (57232 pps) > >> > Output rate : 657782056 bps (129224 pps) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> > > >> >> I'm sorry, your request is getting lost in translation. Why don't you > >> just > >> >> show us your configs and do a 'show route x.x.x.x' and 'show route > >> >> forwarding-table destination x.x.x.x' for the route you are trying to > >> >> load-balance. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Stefan Fouant > >> >> > >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > >> >> ------------------------------ > >> >> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> > >> >> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300 > >> >> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> >> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; < > >> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> >> > > >> >> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > >> >> > >> >> I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120) > >> >> > >> >> Reagards, > >> >> Gabriel Farias > >> >> > >> >> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> >> > >> >>> Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions? > >> >>> > >> >>> Stefan Fouant > >> >>> > >> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > >> >>> ------------------------------ > >> >>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> > >> >>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:32:18 -0300 > >> >>> *To: *<sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> >>> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>; < > >> >>> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > >> >>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > >> >>> > >> >>> I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical > connections > >> >>> (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the > Junos > >> uses > >> >>> the default flow. > >> >>> > >> >>> I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced > way, > >> the > >> >>> previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration > >> >>> routing-instance <name> not have all the options. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks > >> >>> Gabriel Farias > >> >>> > >> >>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> > >> >>> > >> >>>> You need the following: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' > >> >>>> > >> >>>> and > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-balance > >> >>>> per-packet' > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> HTHs. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Stefan Fouant > >> >>>> ------Original Message------ > >> >>>> From: Gabriel Farias > >> >>>> Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > >> >>>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> >>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > >> >>>> Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hi members, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x > >> Cisco > >> >>>> 6509 > >> >>>> (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with > >> the > >> >>>> output unbalanced traffic. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> configuration forwarding-options > >> >>>> > >> >>>> load-balance { > >> >>>> indexed-next-hop; > >> >>>> } > >> >>>> hash-key { > >> >>>> family inet { > >> >>>> layer-3; > >> >>>> layer-4; > >> >>>> } > >> >>>> } > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Gabriel Farias > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the > boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to > New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp