On 17 April 2016 at 12:56, Raphael Mazelier <r...@futomaki.net> wrote: > At a much lower price, what do you think of using a qfx5100 as P/LSR router > ? The mpls support look correct, and it have a lot of 10G ports.
I'm not really clued-up on QFX5k. I know that that TCAM size may be challenge for stuff like lo0 protection. Control-plane scale may be challenging if you run BGP. But if you put Internet in VRF and run BGP free core, both of these are irrelevant. Very likely QFX5k will cover large percentage of P deployment use-cases. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
