On 17 April 2016 at 14:51, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > You don't really need to put the Internet in a VRF to enjoy a BGP-free core.
Nope. But you need Internet in VRF, if you can't put sufficient filter on lo0. > I'd imagine that resources become more of a concern when you put the > global table in a VRF vs. inet.0. Why? I imagine the cost is same. I don't imagine individual route entries in RIB or in FIB have table index and even if they do have, I do not expect that there is special INET version of that structure in hardware, where this index does not exist. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
