On 17 April 2016 at 20:28, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: >> Nope. But you need Internet in VRF, if you can't put sufficient filter on >> lo0. > > I just wouldn't buy the platform in the first place, but that's just me.
There is upside to that strategy, if you drop from long list all devices which have a problem, but problem you can workaround with, you don't have to build a network. > The last time I considered the Internet in a VRF (late 2000's), the > platforms then had different scaling properties with routes in a VRF. > IIRC, the more VRF's the fewer routes per VRF, and vice versa. That appears to support my argument. You have flat pool of prefixes, the more VRF you divide it with, the less prefixes per VRF? > Is it possible to have as many full BGP sessions on a 16GB RAM control > plane in inet.0/inet6.0 as you would the same in a VRF? That is my belief, yes. But I've never tested past few thousand BGP sessions. Usually there isn't any hard limit, it's just config gets slow to parse, boot time becomes problematic etc. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp