On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 15:23:16 CET Luca Beltrame wrote: > Il giorno Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:58:22 +0100 > Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> ha > > scritto: > > * A bug nobody has looked at yet > > How would NEW not fit the bill? (As opposed to UNCONFIRMED) > > > * A bug someone other than the reporter has looked at, but which was > > not reproducible > > Do you mean a single status that covers WORKSFORME / NOTABUG / > INVALID?
No, that's exactly the point! Those go together with having the bug RESOLVED. But the bug hasn't been resolved at this point: it's still open, despite one triager having tried to reproduce and failed. I want to have a status that says, someone has looked at it, but hasn't been able to reproduce. That's _not_ the same thing as worksforme or invalid (we don't have notabug in KDE). Worksforme is only usable if we're really 100% sure that the reporter is mistaken, the application works, we won't have to change any code and can resolve the bug. UNCONFIRMED would mean: someone else than the reporter has already looked at it. But we should still try to reproduce it again. > > > * A bug someone other than the reporter has been able to reproduce. > > This is probably the only possibly use case for CONFIRMED, but I'm not > too keen on the wording (see my other messages on why). > > There are other bits that are important for triaging, but those don't > fit the main topic of this thread. -- Boudewijn Rempt | https://www.valdyas.org | https://www.krita.org