Hi again, On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus <frank7...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all. I could imagine that too.
> I'm not sure if there is a full list somewhere, but you can > always build KDE modules and watch for any Baloo-related output from > CMake. If there is none, then everything will most likely work fine > without Baloo. OK, perhaps we could think about introducing baloo as an opt-in port variant which would only be installed if the user specifically asks for it. But that - of course - could cause a lot of stress during port maintenance. I guess it is better to install baloo and simply disable it. This case should be handled safely by all baloo-dependent KDE applications. Greets, Marko >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
