El Dijous, 10 d'abril de 2014, a les 00:12:55, mk-li...@email.de va escriure: > Hi again, > > On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus <frank7...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all. > > I could imagine that too. > > > I'm not sure if there is a full list somewhere, but you can > > always build KDE modules and watch for any Baloo-related output from > > CMake. If there is none, then everything will most likely work fine > > without Baloo. > > OK, perhaps we could think about introducing baloo as an opt-in port variant > which would only be installed if the user specifically asks for it. But > that - of course - could cause a lot of stress during port maintenance. > > I guess it is better to install baloo and simply disable it. This case > should be handled safely by all baloo-dependent KDE applications.
Again not Baloo guy here, but as far as I know you can't disable "Baloo", what Vishesh told you is how to disable it's file indexer (baloofile), but if you use KMail it(akonadi_baloo_indexer) will still index your emails into the Baloo database, and may be other baloo_stuff (not aware of others existing) running. Vishesh/Dan/someone feel free to correct me. Cheers, Albert > > Greets, > Marko > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe > >> << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<