* Jonathan Barber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > We don't have any particular preference WRT ssh clients, putty was just > choosen as our test as it's what we have used in the past.
This thread got me curious, and it appears that ~2 months ago, GSSAPI support was committed to the PuTTY subversion tree. Anyone tried it? I'd love to move off of all of these hacked/patched versions of PuTTY that are floating around. We're currently using http://sweb.cz/v_t_m/#putty but in the past we've used a variety of things. :/ Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
