Richard E. Silverman wrote: >>>>>> "res" == Richard E Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>>> "petesea" == petesea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > petesea> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> The v_t_m version could use either the Microsoft SSPI, or the MIT > >>> GSSAPI as implemented bi the MIT gssapi32.dll. The new PuTTY only > >>> does SSPI so there are some implications if you are trying to use > >>> this from a non-windows domain machine. (But runas could be used.) > > petesea> That's unfortunate, I wish they would implement both methods. > > petesea> I also wish they would implement GSSAPI Key Exchange, to > petesea> avoid the need to maintain host keys on the client. I > petesea> haven't found any implementation of PuTTY that supports both > petesea> MIT GSSAPI and GSSAPI Key Exchange. > > res> http://rc.quest.com/topics/PuTTY/ > > Oops, you said *MIT* GSSAPI. Indeed. FYI, in the commercial world, > SecureCRT does this.
Yes and it is a fine product. The problem we see, is many third party packages come with the PuTTY plink.exe program under the covers, some with some version of GSSAPI(or SSPI), but not all. It would be nice if the base PuTTY code had the gssapi built in. > > res> -- Richard Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 (630) 252-5444 ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
