[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The v_t_m version could use either the Microsoft SSPI, or the MIT GSSAPI >> as implemented bi the MIT gssapi32.dll. The new PuTTY only does SSPI so >> there are some implications if you are trying to use this from a >> non-windows domain machine. (But runas could be used.) > > That's unfortunate, I wish they would implement both methods.
Please express your concerns to the PuTTY people. A few years ago I tried to get then to add GSS. They added initial support in the SVN so they are open to suggestions. The wishlist page: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/kerberos-gssapi.html says: "fixed-in: r8138 2008-08-10". The Audit trail on the wishlist page says: "We've got this. Perhaps if we say so we can get more pre-release testing." > > I also wish they would implement GSSAPI Key Exchange, to avoid the need to > maintain host keys on the client. I haven't found any implementation of > PuTTY that supports both MIT GSSAPI and GSSAPI Key Exchange. That would be nice. > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > > -- Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 (630) 252-5444 ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
