>>>>> "res" == Richard E Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "petesea" == petesea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: petesea> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> The v_t_m version could use either the Microsoft SSPI, or the MIT >>> GSSAPI as implemented bi the MIT gssapi32.dll. The new PuTTY only >>> does SSPI so there are some implications if you are trying to use >>> this from a non-windows domain machine. (But runas could be used.) petesea> That's unfortunate, I wish they would implement both methods. petesea> I also wish they would implement GSSAPI Key Exchange, to petesea> avoid the need to maintain host keys on the client. I petesea> haven't found any implementation of PuTTY that supports both petesea> MIT GSSAPI and GSSAPI Key Exchange. res> http://rc.quest.com/topics/PuTTY/ Oops, you said *MIT* GSSAPI. Indeed. FYI, in the commercial world, SecureCRT does this. res> -- Richard Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Richard Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos