Em Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:00:21 +0000 "Vincent Panel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| On 2/13/07, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Em Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:53:33 +0100 | > Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | > | > | Le mardi 13 février 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit: | > | > Em Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:56:43 +0100 | > | > | > | > Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | > | > | Le lundi 12 février 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit: | > | | > | > | cooker work ... yes and no, because this will have incidence on the | > | > | stable release. We can't afford another release with a so big mess | > | > | concerning kernel updates. | > | > | > | > Big mess? Which one? Could you explain? | > | > | > | > If you really care for security it's *your* job to know how the system | > | > you're using works, and currently Mandriva does not update kernels | > | > automatically. That's quite well-know. And it's also *your* job to read | > | > our security announcements. | > | | > | I'm not talking about security. | > | Sorry if my words were rude, it wasn't my intention. | > | > You wasn't rude, you've just said something I completely disagree. :) | > | Yes, but updating the kernel is not only a matter of security | (bugfixing and new devices support too). And even if it were the case, | why would easing this task (updating the kernel) be a bad thing ? Let's not miss the point. I said I completely disagree that the security updates is a big mess, that was what Fabrice said in his first e-mail. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
