"Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How to say this in a diplomatic way...the issue is, well, > > procedural. Everyone who was voiced an opinion agrees that the > > change should be made. However, those who are responsible for > > making the change appear to be busy with other things, of whose > > nature we know nothing since they never communicate. > > FWIW, I mostly disagree with automatic kernel updates, unless, > maybe, if they are security-*only* updates. Current Linux kernel > development unmodel makes me very wary of changing a working kernel. > > Of course, a -latest kernel scheme, which one can *choose* to use, > is ok..
the current solution used in contrib doesn't automatically update the kernel, the old one is still there, ...
