Le mardi 13 février 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit : > Em Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:00:21 +0000 > > "Vincent Panel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > | On 2/13/07, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > Em Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:53:33 +0100 > | > > | > Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > | > | Le mardi 13 février 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit: > | > | > Em Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:56:43 +0100 > | > | > > | > | > Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > | > | > | Le lundi 12 février 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino a écrit: > | > | > | > | > | > | cooker work ... yes and no, because this will have incidence on > | > | > | the stable release. We can't afford another release with a so big > | > | > | mess concerning kernel updates. > | > | > > | > | > Big mess? Which one? Could you explain? > | > | > > | > | > If you really care for security it's *your* job to know how the > | > | > system you're using works, and currently Mandriva does not update > | > | > kernels automatically. That's quite well-know. And it's also *your* > | > | > job to read our security announcements. > | > | > | > | I'm not talking about security. > | > | Sorry if my words were rude, it wasn't my intention. > | > > | > You wasn't rude, you've just said something I completely disagree. :) > | > | Yes, but updating the kernel is not only a matter of security > | (bugfixing and new devices support too). And even if it were the case, > | why would easing this task (updating the kernel) be a bad thing ? > > Let's not miss the point. > > I said I completely disagree that the security updates is a big > mess, that was what Fabrice said in his first e-mail.
I was not talking about security updates. I was talking about kernel updates, but not in the meaning of security updates, but in the meaning update kernel. -- Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la betise humaine. En ce qui concerne l'univers je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue. Albert Enstein.
