I also agree that sig-on-prem better describes the goal.
> On 30 Nov 2016, at 16:06, Justin Garrison > <justin.garri...@disneyanimation.com> wrote: > > If sig-aws has a reason to exist, then so does sig-metal. People who use the > cloud have (justifiably) no interest in mechanics that will be mandatory in > bare metal - like choice of load balancers, networking across data centers, > etc > > With that being said, I don't think this should be called sig-metal. The > focus of the sig shouldn't be explicitly about running on hardware (although > that may be many of the topics). Running kubernetes without cloud environment > support is more what I would like to discuss and would not alienate users > running on VMs behind their firewall. > > Possible name ideas > • sig-on-prem > • sig-no-cloud > • sig-firewalled > • sig-legacy > • sig-the-hard-way > • sig-unhosted > • sig-from-scratch > It must be too early. I'm obviously joking about sig-no-cloud > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kubernetes-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-dev/fbf7dd5b-a66b-480f-9e67-6b87680c9af1%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Kubernetes Engineering - Poland -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
