> > If sig-aws has a reason to exist, then so does sig-metal. People who use > the cloud have (justifiably) no interest in mechanics that will be > mandatory in bare metal - like choice of load balancers, networking across > data centers, etc >
With that being said, I don't think this should be called sig-metal. The focus of the sig shouldn't be explicitly about running on hardware (although that may be many of the topics). Running kubernetes without cloud environment support is more what I would like to discuss and would not alienate users running on VMs behind their firewall. Possible name ideas - sig-on-prem - sig-no-cloud - sig-firewalled - sig-legacy - sig-the-hard-way - sig-unhosted - sig-from-scratch It must be too early. I'm obviously joking about sig-no-cloud -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
