Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > On 5/22/07, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I didn't think we were talking about the general case, I thought we >> > were discussing the PV case. >> > >> >> In case of KVM no one is speaking of pure PV. >> > > Why not? It seems worthwhile to come up with something that can cover > the whole spectrum instead of having different hypervisors (and > interfaces). >
That's the plan. PV I/O and PV mmu are on the roadmap. PV timers and interrupts should be easily doable too. The far end of the spectrum (PV with no hardware virtualization extensions) is possible, but no one is planning to do it AFAIK. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
