Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:00:42AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > >> On 5/22/07, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I'm not opposed to supporting emulation environments, just don't make >>> a large pile of crap the default like Xen -- and having to integrate >>> PCI probing code in my guest domains is a large pile of crap. >>> >> Exactly. I'm about to start a pretty large project here, using xen or >> kvm, not sure. One thing for sure, we are NOT going to use anything >> but PV devices. Full emulation is nice, but it's just plain silly if >> you don't have to do it. And we don't have to do it. So let's get the >> PV devices right, not try to shoehorn them into some framework like >> PCI. >> > > If you don't care about full virtualization kvm is the wrong project for > you. You might want to take a look at lguest. > >
This is incorrect. While kvm started out as a full virtualization project, it will expand with I/O PV and core PV. Eventually most of the paravirt_ops interface will have a kvm implementation. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
