In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sue Babbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >> I agree with Sue, that making an Arachne group entry would be >> interesting. But the logistics of it... The mind boggles <g> >> >I don't know - the frequency with which we all discuss things, it might well >make faster progress than a group which only meets monthly! >Sue
Remember the lace globe that we talked about doing for the Millennium? I don't think it was the making that would have been the problem, more where to exhibit it and what to do with it afterwards. At least this time there would be somewhere for it to be exhibited initially (at least the problem of number of entries versus gallery space has been addressed this time!). The maximum size allowed could dictate how many individual pieces of lace were incorporated, and we would need to discover the group expert on mounting. But I think it could be done - we have three years (when we know what the theme is to be next time round) and would need to stick to very strict deadlines (to allow time after completion of the lace for collation, construction/mounting, things to go wrong and getting it to The Hollies (or wherever). The only problem would be in the stability of the group membership over that period of time? If the entry won a prize, of course, it would then be a case of voting who would collect, and possibly hold, it on the group's behalf? -- Jane Partridge - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
