> wound up getting the Compaq Presario T2080 (with Atheros
> wireless ) at Best Buy.

>What I did get a
> chance to do though
> was download and fire up Nevada b67 via the BeleniX
> 0.6.1 LiveCD (also,
> I stuck with Xfce and the Realtek ethernet NIC for
> now) and everything,
> including LAN/WAN/DHCP discovery worked great!
>
> Eric

1. Over the years, we have been quite fond of Athlon-based (both 32- and 
64-bit) HP notebooks. Since about one year or so ago, we have not had any 
problem running Solaris Express on any of our HP notebooks. The only problem is 
wireless. Next time around we will be paying attention to getting only those 
with Atheros card. All our notebooks are with ATI or nVidia video card.

2. On one of the notebooks we tested, with Casper's frkit script running, the 
power consumption measured with a Wattmeter was 14 W for Solaris Express, 
versus 18~19 W for Linux (SuSE/Fedora) and WindowsXP, during idle.

3. Linux (SuSE/Ubuntu/Fedora) has problems with some of the models, and I don't 
trust Windows when browsing the web. This leaves Solaris Express the only 
option.

4. During this year's Computex Taipei, one of the most appealing products was 
the "Asus Eee PC 701 notebook":

http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3829

* Display: 7"
* Processor: Intel mobile CPU (Intel 910 chipset, 900MHz Dothan Pentium M)
* Memory: 512MB RAM
* OS: Linux (Asus customized flavor)
* Storage: 8GB or 16GB flash hard drive
* Webcam: 300K pixel video camera
* Battery life: 3 hours using 4-cell battery
* Weight: 2lbs
* Dimensions: 8.9 in x 6.5 in x 0.82 in - 1.37 in (width x depth x thickness)
* Ports: 3 USB ports, 1 VGA out, SD card reader, modem, Ethernet, 
head/microphone
* Bootup time: 10 seconds
* Price: $250

Even though the hardware design is ugly and the software (Asus' own version of 
Linux) is IMNSHO stupid (apparently Asus didn't use their best engineers to put 
together their own Linux "distro"), I am definitely going to get one when it 
becomes available. But this is not my point.

My point is, perhaps we can try to work with Asus to design a better, 
Solaris-based, system (at least on the software part). Most hardware 
manufactures don't have a clue how to deal with GPL, I believe they will feel 
more comfortable with CDDL once properly educated. Plus, (paid) support for 
desktops (which necessitates low per-unit cost) is always illusory in Linux. 
Solaris/Sun should be in a much better position to address this critical issue.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to