On 04/12/2012 12:59, Martin wrote:
On 04/12/2012 12:44, Felipe Ferreira da Silva wrote:
On 12-04-2012 09:31, Martin wrote:
Anyway, "improved with appropriated features": Which ones do you
think can not be done in a package? (Assuming that all needed
methods and hooks, are added to IDEIntf)?
But wouldn't be easier make direct implementations on the IDE instead
of make constant adaptations?
My general experience says, no it would not be easier.
Let me clarify:
The code would be maintained the same as the IDE. It could be installed
by default. (Such as codetools, they are a package, but without them the
IDE would not be what it is)
In a separate step, existing window management (positioning of the none
docked windows) could also be extracted to a package. Then the IDE would
always need a window-manager installed.
Then from the end users view the window manager (docked or not) would be
part of the IDE. But technically its a package.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
