On 11/21/06, Ben Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No dependencies on PPP in MLS code. Ben
Right, MLS packages up its data and uses Afaria to transmit/receive it, no? By the way, it's been one of my pet peeves since I started using MLS, but I was wondering if I was the only one that thought that locking MLS and preventing any further action during transmission was a poor design idea on their part? Personally, I don't see why they can't take a "snapshot" of the data and send that. This would allow a person to transmit and still be able to pull up that set of Primary Roles that all the sudden someone wanted. Even read-only access so that no data is updated until transmission is over would be a big step in the right direction. Also, as finance clerk, I'm pretty good at making sure I transmit my changes to SLC. However, it often annoys me that instead of taking just a short time to transmit my finances, I get a lot of membership updates, and have to print out all those reports. Sometimes I really wish that if a finance guy transmits, only the finances are dealt with. Likewise for membership I'm sure. (Although I doubt he ever gets finance reports) My apologies for the tirade. It's just something that has always bothered me, and I can't explain why. -- -- Joe
_______________________________________________ Ldsoss mailing list Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
