George Metz wrote:
> Why I never went anywhere with mine was mostly because I sent out several
> e-mails to this list, and the lack of a response was almost deafening in
> it's silence. If I recall, not even you commented David. I assumed that
> people had weighed the concept and decided it wasn't worth the effort to
> switch, so I moved onward.
You said you get several questions a week :-)
I hadn't realized you stopped development or whatever; I've been
watching the Linux 2.4 development with interest. I had originally
thought that 2.4 would take another 100k or something the way glibc
2.1 did; when your versions of Linux 2.4 showed up under 500k that was
very interesting.
Perhaps the lack of interest is because:
1) users don't understand how to change kernels
2) no one has an overriding need to change to 2.4
3) no one has been given a need to change to 2.4 (i.e., no marketing)
4) people still think there isn't enough room on disk
Solutions are, in order:
1) Convert the developers over so that new versions of LEAF and of
firewall software use Linux 2.4
2) -- no fix ---
3) Advertize Linux 2.4, pitching the advantages on the list
4) Post sizes too....
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
