Hi guys,
Have installed this package but I have a question about a message
that it displays when it is loading.
Starting dhrelay on eth1 eth2 eth3 eth4 eth5
Route: not found
Route: not found
Route: not found
Route: not found
Route: not found
Route: not found
Why is it giving this "Route: not found" message? When I do an "IP
route" command I get the following:
192.168.145.0/24 dev eth5 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.145.1
192.168.144.0/24 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.144.1
192.168.133.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.133.1
192.168.143.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.143.1
192.168.142.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.142.1
192.168.141.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.141.1
default via 192.168.133.1 dev eth0
Can someone please explain why I am getting this "Route: not found"
message? Why is it expecting a route? Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] DHCP REQUESTS FORWARDED BETWEEN SUBNETS
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 04:28, Ed Tetz wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> One last question, How would I have known (or should I have known) what
> kernel versions the packages are by looking at the CVS page?
>
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/packages/glibc-2.0/d
> hcrelay.lrp
>
> I didn't really see anything on that page or it's links that told me
> anything. Do I need software other than my web browser to tell the
> differences between the versions? Is there a separate index page that
would
> tell me the differences or would that normally be in the description (not
to
> slight you, as you have been doing great work on compiling everything into
> one place - I am impressed)?
Ed,
No. I didn't include the kernel information, because it's a guess on my
part. These packages from Koon Wong are three years old, and no one has
been able to contact him in over two years.
Once we get the initial creation of our packages tree done, updates and
corrections should commence. I wish the repository was in better shape,
but it's not currently. All we can do is try to improve it.
I'll revert the dhcrelay.lrp package to the 1.3 cvs version in the next
couple of days. My thanks to everyone that spotted this problem.
I don't know if you're subscribed to the leaf-devel list, but there was
a discussion of a new .desc file that would correct many of the package
information problems you're seeing. Kernel version is one of the
suggested fields.
> Sorry, I guess that was three questions :-)
No problem. I'm glad to help where and when I can. :-)
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
