Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In any case, it doesn't appear to be just me, since someone else originally > > reported this problem, and I was just confirming that I can reproduce it. > > Well, until you put as much effort into getting a packet trace of the > problem as you did writing that post, it's not going to get solved.
I don't currently have any software set up to do network sniffing (nor do I have much experience with such software), so doing that would be a lot more effort than simply writing a post. Anyway, as I said, the "* * *" on the first hop doesn't really bother me, now that I know to expect it. I had noticed the problem but didn't have any immediate plans to report it. I just wanted to back up what the original reporter was saying, since you said you couldn't reproduce it. -- Dan Harkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://harkless.org/dan/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
