S Mohan wrote:
I rather favor a mechanism whereby package->module dependencies can be expressed in the package. Including kernel modules in .lrp's like ppp, pppoa or shorwall (just to name one) will yield nightmarish results when we try to introduce a new kernel version.While I'm not that aware of various options, I think a few modules are mandatory or have to go with some packages. E.g. ipsec.o with ipsec(509).lrp, bridge.o with bridge.lrp, netfilter with tc.lrp etc. I was looking at this. In addition, 90-95% of the users would use a common combination. Dial up connections use PPP over serial ports etc. Such popular combinations can also be packaged to gether.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
