How many majors did he win? And why didn't he win any?! 

Sent from my iPhone

On 09/07/2013, at 0:16, "Matt Anderson" <m...@leeds-united.net> wrote:

> FFS, he was number one in the world for years. I'd love to be that weak minded
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 8 Jul 2013, at 17:14, Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> No but he bottled the majors. No other reason he didn't win one. He had the 
>> talent but nerves meant that he couldn't convert. Isn't that the very 
>> definition of bottler?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 09/07/2013, at 0:11, "Alan Edgar" <alan.ed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> So you're gonna ignore his Ryder cup record ?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 16:54, Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 23:52, "Alan Edgar" <alan.ed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Goran was a better grass court player than Henman - by beating him he 
>>>>> reached his 3rd final.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just as the roof closing changed the final last year, the weather in 2001 
>>>>> saved Goran - half an hour more and Henman would have won. Coming back 
>>>>> the following day was a whole new ball game.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On a similar tack - Monty never won a golf major ... Is he a bottler ?
>>>> In a word: yes
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 16:29, Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yeah they gathered to watch Henman, so fair enough 'Herman Hill'. But 
>>>>>> they gathered to watch Murray all fortnight, so Murray mound. Yeah - if 
>>>>>> they are there to watch Robson it's Robson ridge. It's a nickname. You 
>>>>>> make some good points but this is total bobbins.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> He did bottle it. The year ivanesivic won he should have - but he 
>>>>>> bottled it. He could win tour titles but he never had the mental 
>>>>>> strength to win a slam - he was a choker and a bottler and that's just a 
>>>>>> plain fact mate.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 23:17, "Alan Edgar" <alan.ed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Henman was the first player people gathered there to see - just because 
>>>>>>> he was a lesser player than Murray doesn't mean the name changes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If Laura robson wins more titles than Murray is it suddenly robson 
>>>>>>> ridge ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Henman didn't bottle it - he played according to his level, maximising 
>>>>>>> his talent. It wasn't quite enough, doesn't make him a loser.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Any pro sportsman who gets to be top 5 has bags more bottle than you, 
>>>>>>> me or anyone else on this list - they couldn't get there without it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Both Henman & Murray have managed a decade or so each of totally 
>>>>>>> unreasonable pressure re Wimbledon magnificently.
>>>>>>> Without them you'd have had 20 more years of media weeping and wailing 
>>>>>>> about GB tennis for a fortnight before reverting to total indifference 
>>>>>>> for the other 50 weeks of the year.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 15:54, Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 22:42, "Alan Edgar" <alan.ed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On the contrary - disrespectful to Henman to change it.
>>>>>>>> Nonsense. Was the hill there before Henman and has it been officially 
>>>>>>>> called 'Herman hill'? 
>>>>>>>>> If Grayson had won more than Revie would you accept Revie Rd becoming 
>>>>>>>>> Grayson Grove ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Not if it had been officially called that - but that's completely 
>>>>>>>> different to a media nickname.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Didn't think so.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Henman was the best since Perry - 60+ years. Murray wasn't around 
>>>>>>>>> then.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> He's been playing in wombledon for nearly 10 years hasn't he? I
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Murray is the best since Perry - 70+ years ... Didn't think the maths 
>>>>>>>>> would be so challenging.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If your definition of a loser is someone who doesn't win a slam then 
>>>>>>>>> more than 99% of all pro tennis players are losers.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd say someone who was talented enough to win a slam but doesn't is a 
>>>>>>>> loser, yes. He undoubtedly could have won wombledon but he bottled it 
>>>>>>>> every time.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It's a(nother) ridiculous assertion.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I don't think it is.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 8 Jul 2013, at 14:54, Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2013, at 21:29, "Alan Edgar" <alan.ed...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bollocks! He is a miserable uncouth yob who lost to a true 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sportsman.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What on earth is your rationale for that ? !! 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Murray is a charming and witty interviewee, equally gracious in 
>>>>>>>>>>> defeat as in victory.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The stupendous Djoko- Del potro SF should have been the Final.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The final was exactly what the seeding dictated it should have been 
>>>>>>>>>>> - 1 v 2 in the world.
>>>>>>>>>>> DP did play great and made it a quality semi.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Must grudgingly admit that The Git did play well today, though.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Big of you.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldnt see this as a british victory if I was scottish, why 
>>>>>>>>>>>> would I? but
>>>>>>>>>>> then again I wouldnt see it as a scottish victory when the english 
>>>>>>>>>>> man won
>>>>>>>>>>> tour de france.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If you'd written:
>>>>>>>>>>> "I wouldnt see this as a british victory if I was scottish, why 
>>>>>>>>>>> would I? but
>>>>>>>>>>> then again I wouldnt see it as a british victory when the english 
>>>>>>>>>>> man won
>>>>>>>>>>> tour de france.'
>>>>>>>>>>> then it would have made sense - even though I would 100% disagree 
>>>>>>>>>>> with you.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not comparing like with like.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It's a Brit win when Wiggins wins the Tour, a Brit win when Murray 
>>>>>>>>>>> wins Wimbledon and a Brit win when they both (while wearing Brit 
>>>>>>>>>>> kit) win gold in London 2012.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's hope all the Scots see this as a British victory - bet they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> will not.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Only the bitter ones will not - the others will see it a win for 
>>>>>>>>>>> both Scotland & Britain.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. I think the real miserable bastards are the ones who want 
>>>>>>>>>>>> him to lose.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't agree more.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I couldn't believe it when Sue effing Barker referred to 'henman 
>>>>>>>>>>>> hill' when she interviewed him after.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Why ? It's been know as that ever sinbce the last century - the 
>>>>>>>>>>> name doesn't change just cos Murray won the tournament.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Because it was known as Henman Hill when everyone there was there to 
>>>>>>>>>> support Henman. He is retired. It is disrespectful to Murray. Murray 
>>>>>>>>>> Mound.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now he WAS a loser.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Lost 4 Wimbledon semis - 3 to the world number 1s (Hewitt, Sampras) 
>>>>>>>>>>> and one to an inspired Goran who was saved by the weather.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2 other Slam semis - ranked 4 in the world.
>>>>>>>>>>> Gave us a decade of hope and excitement after previously having to 
>>>>>>>>>>> pray that Bates would maybe get to round 3 one year.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> He never won a slam. Yeah he won some tour titles but he was a loser.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Brit player for 60+ years - wish I was that sort of loser ...
>>>>>>>>>> Murray is.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Al 
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Leedslist mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Info and options: 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>> 
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Reply via email to