I understand its a difficult situation, Im not arguing that. what the
officers should have done? they shouldnt have killed an innocent man.
its simple. i believe its their JOB, they get training, they get
salaries, they have all the frikking information
they need, and then some (costing me my privacy I might add) and this
is the result?
there is NO need to ask ME what they should have done, ask the the
responsible. but who
are they? nobody was deemed responsible. who are the responsible
Mark, you re asking me. does
this mean you dont know?
let me ask you Mark; were you and your family born equal to this
man? or a bit more worth? maybe a bit less?
what do you think? I guess your answer is yes; we were equal.
that implies you have equal rights as humans. If your brother were
shot like a piss of shit 7 times in the head
like he was would you have liked the responsible convicted? hmm.
whats thats smell?? hypocricy?
surely not. why dont YOU write it to us Mark: if my a member of my
family was shot like this I d be Ok if noone was deemed
responsible.
Go on, Im waiting.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course it would look like that to you, I expected nothing else.
It *is* a case of 'tuff shit, too bad, move on' for all those people
expecting any kind of criminal prosecution of police officers in this
matter.
Tell us Eric, what do you think the Police officers on the scene
should
have done that day? Hindsight is a wonderful thing, lets not
forget as
far as they were concerned that person was a suicide bomber (not might
be).
to me it looks like you re thinking; tuff shit, too bad. lets move
on.
as in: nothing happened, noboby is responsible or should be held
responsible for this.
very stylish
On 7/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand you could be carrying a cruise missile, but if you
drop
it when instructed to you wouldn't get shot.
This isnt about who was shot or what they were or were not
carrying, its
about what police officers judged to be a threat to public
safety. With
the tube shooting it is unfortunate that the nature of the threat
left
no
opportunity for the victim to be challenged as they were already
in a
crowded public area.
He should be seen as another tragic vitim of the suicide bombings
and
attempted suicide bombings. The blood is on their hands, noone
elses.
Fortunately we live in a country where this kind of thing doesn't
happen
on a regular basis, so it is understandable that our Police force
might
not be 100% competent in surveillance and intelligence in such
matters.
The misinformation that came out from the Met Police immediately
following
the shooting is inexcusable though, they should either say
nothing or
say
what they know is fact.
In london you only need to be carrying a chair leg in a plastic bag
to get shot dead by the police, and that was before the recent
bombings
m
On 18 Jul 2006, at 09:39, Sean Emmott wrote:
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
administrators accept no liability for the personal views and
opinions
of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
oh alright then :-)
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
oh alright then :-)
