Can't say I would have blamed any Leeds player who refused to defer their wages so that Ken could rob every other bugger. We KNOW that the majority of the debt was fictitious anyway, as it has just been written off - indicating it was never going to be a 'pressing debt'. Did the deferred waged players have a vote in the creditors meeting, by any chance? Cheers Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mark Humphries > Sent: 05 June 2007 09:10 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who? > > It appears that Healy was one of the two players who refused > to defer their > wages, and as a result won't play for Leeds again. > > Any ideas who the other was? > > An interesting comment by Bates though, it sort of implies > that him staying > may have been an option otherwise, which also suggests the > wages of at least > some of the top players might be sustainable in league one. > > Interesting comparison between Wise and Healy though. Wise > defers wages and > voluntarily offers a wage cut for next season, Healy won't > even defer his > wages.. > > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
