----- Original Message ----- >....Bates always intended to pay it all back, .......
If Bates had been forced into administration by the unreasonable people at HMRC and then the new owners of the club had become whoever offered the best deal to the creditors then there may be some credibility in your position. If Bates' version of events is accurate (which of course it is) then he is an incredibly lucky man who must be fantastically grateful to the HMRC for making all this possible for him. It appears that full credit is due to HMRC for the situation where the previous owners of the club are the same as the new owners of the club and they have luckily got rid of nearly all their debt. All this at no cost to themselves. What you say - how is it at no cost to themselves ? Well think about it. The money they have supposedly lost was money that they had already spent. It was spent anyway. The other creditors have lost their money but the new owners of the club still have the club that they paid their money for. Nothing has been lost by them because what they bought and paid for is still in their hands. All of it. How lucky is that ? How churlish to attack HMRC who are the very people who made it all possible. It is just another way of getting other people to pay for things for you. The unpaid creditors have been paying the running costs of the club. Some people will believe anything. Wanna buy a bridge ? _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
