On Thu, June 28, 2007 9:18 am, Mark Humphries wrote: > http://www.leedsunited.com/page/NewsroomDetail/0,,10273~1062957,00.html > > > > No doubt some will attempt to throw considerable doubt over the contents, > which come across to me as entirely reasonable.
If Bates had acted in good faith through the whole CVA procedure, and if there were not three anonymous off shore companies (at least one of which Bates had an interest in 6 months ago) owed such large sums by LUFC, do you think there would have been the same possibility of challenges being made to the CVA? It's all very well saying that Bates hasn't done anything illegal - the fact is we don't know that everything has been done legally - _that's_ why HMRC are looking at things so closely. As for the statement, it looks to me like harvey is saying "look, we know it all looks a bit dodgy, but let us get away with it or we'll shut the club down." You think that sounds reasonable - I think it sounds like blackmail. - Sean _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
