I thought it was a given that all football debts would be paid in full, or are the FL just ensuring they get paid in a reasonable time, not like £1 a year?
What is it with the salary cap? That seems a bit odd to me. Who sets the cap? How long for? Will that effect currently contracted players (if the cap is lower)? Re HMRC, if LUFC agree to this alleged backhand payment of debts then surely every other creditor will be up in arms. Why should HMRC get more than anyone else is due? I can see why the FL want this to be done, they are still running scared from the HMRC and hoping they will just go away. If they are that worried then why dont they pay off HMRC themselves - it isnt for LUFC's good if the HMRC get more money and slink off, it is a football league issue and they/we should all pay for it, especially as they have just been given £100m by the prem league. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Emmott > Sent: 02 August 2007 10:15 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LU] The final countdown > > Posted on WACCOE (so it must be true), but at it least sounds credible > and > consistent with other things we've heard (sorry for the second hand > rumour > mongering, but I'm guessing in this situation that we're all desperate > to > hear all we can and then draw our own conclusions). > > Oh, and for the sake of accuacy: FACT! END OF! > > "Seems to include a lot of snippets that have been covered on here, but > there are number of interesting points. Roll on 12noon!! > > > Now then boys. > > I know, I know you haven't heard from me for a while since I came > through > with some decent info last season but I had a chat last night that I > just > needed to share with you. > > Basically this comes from a Leeds United representative who has been > involved in the talks with the Football League this week. Talks > actually > started on tuesday PM and continued all day yesterday - i'll pick > through > the best snippets of ingot that he was able to give me. > > - Leeds had been 'given assurances' before their meeting they would > receive their share back at the meeting on tuesday and had arranged for > contracts to be drawn up for the players to sign on the tuesday evening > (night of Darlo game) tranferring registration to new LU2007 company. > Unfortunately this was not the case and Leeds were furious. Wise had > been > told he would be able to sign new players from tuesday night and was > 'deeply upset' this was not the case. It is understood a couple of the > trialists and players being lined up are getting itchy feet and may go > elsewhere in search of a contract. > > - FL had backtracked on a verbal agreement that if certain paperwork > was > produced they would hand over the share 'without delay'. The paperwork > went to them two weeks ago, they then asked for more on monday of last > week, KPMG supplied it on weds last week. FL seem to be 'chainging the > goalposts'. > > - KPMG initially refused to attend the meeting on tuesday due to and > issue > with legal fees (Leeds didnt want to pay them to attend??) but they > were > at the meeting yesterday and will be there today. > > - PFA have been present at the meeting and will meet with Leeds players > today. Several players have asked the PFA when/how/under what > circumstances they can walk away from their contracts. This has angered > Bates and there may be players that because of this will not play for > the > club again. > > - The court action from HMRC is still very much alive despite press > speculation. Even though the CVA has been scrapped the court case in > Early > Sept is still on the court schedule and it is understood HMRC will > still > press ahead with it. For this reason THEY themselves have also been > involved in the talks with LU and FL this week. FL not happy to proceed > with threat from HMRC looming. > > - FL 'should' reluctantly give our share back this morning but were > frantically drawing up a legal contract last night with which Leeds > must > agree to adhere to before this is returned. This will include a wage > cap, > a payback scheme of all debts to players, MANAGERS (inc. Blackwell- > this > has been a moot point in discussion which FL are very unhappy about), > All > Football league clubs and also an agreed payback compromise to the > HMRC. > The payback deal to the HMRC is understood to be the key stumbling > block. > If this is agreed in the meeting the HMRC have agreed to drop their > case > at which point the share will be given back. If Leeds refuse to accept > this point or compromise it to a satisfactory degree they may still be > given their share back but with a suspended points deduction awarded > which > would either be actioned or overturned pending the results of the court > case with HMRC. > > - If Leeds do get share today there will be 2/3 new players purchased > (with real money!) 3/4 players signed on which will include those on > trial > and also 4/5 players from last season given new contracts. There will > be a > new shirt sponsorship announced in time for first home game of the > season. > > That was about as much information as I could hope to get, I will come > back on and post more I and when I can" > > - Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions > of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
