Now you are just taking the mick aren't you.?
Or have you lost the ability to read? _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Time to get back to the footy And more importantly, HMRC policy is to challenge CVAs in the courts, so ensuring the CVA cannot be approved. This means no club entering a CVA will be able to exit from admin via CVA. Get this into your head. It is not about Bates. HMRC would have done the same thing no matter who was chairman. HMRC wants a test case to challenge the right of 'football creditors' to retain their preferntial status - a position HMRC has recently lost. Hence also Mawhinney citing all the other 41 receiverships as being via CVA - these pre-date HMRC losing its preferential status. I repeat - it's not about Bates. It's HMRC vs Football - and we're in the firing line. Maybe Bates didn't expect that. Equally, maybe he did... Mark _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
