> You must have been watching a different game. Crewe > were streets ahead of us. Yes we had a decent first 10 > minutes but even in the first half they passed it and > moved it much better than us. After 20 minutes it was > clear that we were going to really struggle to get > anything from this match. Second half they controlled > until their keeper f*cked up and then they shat > themselves. Having said that I think the ref could > have played 30 minutes of injury time instead of the 6 > and we still wouldn't have scored. In fact I think > they would have won it. > Absolutely right. It was quite refreshing to actually get the six minutes of injury time though. Usually they point at their watches when all the time wasting is going on, as if to say "Don't worry, I'm taking note" and then add two minutes on. having said that, they looked more likely to score in the six minutes than we did.
_______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
