--- Alick Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rich - what are the answers then? > > * Give McAllister more time to get the team playing > football?
Without a doubt. The blokes only been here a few weeks. I think he'll learn who is up to it and who isn't. > * Get a new set of players who can control a ball in > the summer? That would be nice however I think we do have players who could gel as a team. My current feeling is Kilkenny and Prutton centrally but that would exclude Howson who I thought was terrible yesterday but can play and will develop. > * Play route one to get out of this league? I certainly think Mcallister should ditch the short corner / quick free kick approach. It's just delaying the inevitable and usually ends up with us not getting the ball in to the box. > * Get a more experienced manager in? Maybe but it's Mcallister now. > * Play with 5 in the middle with 2 proper wide men > and an anchor man? That would have helped yesterday however that front man has to have something about him and neither Flo or Kandol could have played up front alone. > * Put a rocket up all the players' arses cos they > are good enough? I think there are players in that team who are going to struggle to progress beyond this level. I don't think Sweeney is up to it and I think Fraser is really struggling with his passing game. Kandol is a lump who might get you 5-10 goals in this league from one yard out headers but he really is not up to it. > * Get some pace into the team ASAP? Yes, we always talk about pace and we did go through a spell where we looked fit and sharp but we seem to have taken a step backwards with signings such as Sweeney and Johnson. Kilkenny is not blessed with pace either. When you add Howson and a few others you can see that we are pretty one paced. > * Burn Kandol? Hmmmm .... there's an idea. > > stotty > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Simon Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LU] On an optimistic note > > > > You must have been watching a different game. > Crewe > > were streets ahead of us. Yes we had a decent > first 10 > > minutes but even in the first half they passed it > and > > moved it much better than us. After 20 minutes it > was > > clear that we were going to really struggle to get > > anything from this match. Second half they > controlled > > until their keeper f*cked up and then they shat > > themselves. Having said that I think the ref could > > have played 30 minutes of injury time instead of > the 6 > > and we still wouldn't have scored. In fact I think > > they would have won it. > > > > > > > > --- Simon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I don't think we were quite played off the park > by > >> them. We didn't play > >> particularly well (I did have a joke about being > >> lots of rubbish on the > >> pitch - and some carrier bags and crisp packets > too; > >> but that was an > >> obvious one even before the game), but they never > >> even made it near our > >> goal until half an hour was gone. Their most used > >> tactic was to have a > >> player collapse in their own box when we were > >> attacking - on one > >> occasion two of them managed it. Plus there was > that > >> "oh-no, we screwed > >> up our substitution - and after you slowly walked > >> all the way over here > >> to come off too" that suggested they couldn't > wait > >> for the game to end. > >> > >> I normally spend any game in a heightened state > of > >> panic where the > >> opponent looks like Brazil and we look like a > bunch > >> of Sunday Leaguers > >> who've only just met, eternally one shanked pass > >> from gifting a goal. > >> Crewe never really triggered that reaction, even > >> after the goal and > >> their improvement in the second half (which given > >> their first, did not > >> have to be much of one to be noticeable). > >> > >> - Si > >> > >> Richard Walker wrote: > >> > Yes Rob, but we've been played off the park by > >> Crewe > >> > at home. Doesn't that make us about the worse > team > >> in > >> > the league at the moment. > >> > > >> > > >> > --- Robert HEATH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >> Far be it for me to indulge in any of the > >> >> chicken-counting of which I > >> >> have been so critical of others for jinxing us > >> >> recently, > >> >> but............. > >> >> > >> >> I note next week's oppoes just lost 0-3 at > home > >> to > >> >> Walsall and acc. to > >> >> the report on footymad were total vomit. > >> >> > >> >> And then we have 2 home games against > Bourneham > >> and > >> >> Cheltenmouth, teams > >> >> from the lower reaches who we should > >> >> easily............what? Oh. > >> >> > >> >> Rob Heath > >> >> Bangkok Khow > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list > and > >> >> the list administrators accept no liability > for > >> the > >> >> personal views and opinions of contributors. > >> >> Leedslist mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> > >> > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >> >> DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > >> SODS!!!! > >> >> DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > >> SODS!!!! > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > __________________________________________________________ > >> > Sent from Yahoo! Mail. > >> > A Smarter Inbox. > >> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list > and > >> the list administrators accept no liability for > the > >> personal views and opinions of contributors. > >> > Leedslist mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > > >> > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >> > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > SODS!!!! > >> > DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > SODS!!!! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > >> the list administrators accept no liability for > the > >> personal views and opinions of contributors. > >> Leedslist mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >> DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > SODS!!!! > >> DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY > SODS!!!! > >> > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail. > > A Smarter Inbox. > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators > > accept no liability for the personal views and > opinions of contributors. > > Leedslist mailing list > > [email protected] > === message truncated === ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!! DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
