Richard, What I am saying is that Malthaus spurred the green revolution. AIDS is eminently treatable. A Swine fever pandemic was avoided.
Solutions................. not for everyone ........... but disasters avoided and made liveable. All outcome predictions have been wrong in degree but served a valuable purpose. It would behold us all to stop evangelical dicking around about ' how' because it got nowhere & is unreliable. Warming as such is widely accepted. Contingency, plans such as they may be are more feasible. So why not go that way? Preventing a debatable cause by presenting unacceptable solutions is a failure. Is that what you want? Michael Dr Michael Benjamin, Community Psychiatrist ------------------------------- myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT http://www.myRay.com ------------------------------ Mental Health: http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com -------------------------------- Auditing || Quality Control http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/ -------------------------------- Blog: http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com Sent from Ramat Gan, Israel On 29 January 2010 14:22, Richard Naef <[email protected]>wrote: > > Really? > > I thought that the most reliable correlation between any > > event and global warming was the Sun's hot spots or solar bursts. > > but then you arent a scientist are you? > > > > Remember every dooms day prediction has been over inflated > > and yet met with . The lack of food, AIDS,2000 bug & Swine > > fever are some examples. > > yea right! because no one starves in the world and Aids isnt killing > hundreds of thousands a year so we must be brilliant! > > 2k bug wasn't a scientific lead scare story. I'll give u that swine flu > wasn't as nasty (yet) as predicted by the vast majority of scientists , BUT > it was a pandemic in terms of the way it spread and we were better safe > than > sorry. > > ttfn > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist www.leedslist.net
