In my Source I include a trascript of the family unit
including boarders, but do not include the
non-relative group members in the DB with a RIN.
Rich in LA CA
--- Quest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In the Legacy Training CD regarding how to deal with
> Census Entries, it is 
> suggested that you list someone who is not obviously
> a family member as a 
> "New Unlinked Individual" (under the ADD tab on the
> toolbar).  That way, if 
> the surname happens to pop up again in your research
> as a family member, you 
> will have recorded the existence of that surname as
> having lived with the 
> family in a particular census.  This happened with
> one of the surnames I 
> found listed as a lodger.  The person, it turns out,
> was really the brother 
> of the wife of the head of household, even though he
> was listed as a lodger. 
> I did not know her surname at first, but later found
> out.
> 
> Karima
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Janis Gilmore
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 2:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Suggestions wanted please:
> How to enter "boarder"
> 
> 
> I think I would enter two individuals, not attached
> to anyone, in my 
> database: David Williams (with the appropriate age
> data etc) and David 
> Kaspar (entering same).  A "Note" event in each file
> saying "David Williams 
> is likely to be the same individual as David Kaspar
> (RIN)" and adding your 
> reasoning in believing so. Enter the census data for
> David Williams as his, 
> then enter the census data for David Kaspar in the
> David Williams file as an 
> event called "Possible census."
> 
> The thing to remember, is that when you look at your
> index, to find someone, 
> or match people, you want to give yourself every
> opportunity to find what 
> you are looking for.
> 
> I agree - these two entries probably represent the
> same person. But in 
> serious research, take nothing for granted. Let it
> ride under both scenarios 
> until you get more info that leads you to a
> well-reasoned hypothesis in one 
> direction or the other.
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to