Just as an example of how this can be confusing - My grandmother's sister went back to England from Western New York to visit their grandparents. She is listed in their household in Morebath, Devon in the 1891 census "on 5 Apr 1891" but she lived in the US, having left England in 1884. She is listed as their granddaughter but there is no mention that she was a visitor, not a resident. And to complicate matters, she was the informant on the death records of both of the grandparents who died while she was there on 25 Apr 1891 and 28 Apr 1891. Sure makes it look like she lived there! Mary -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Hallford Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:19 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Grandaugher without parents? Tks to all who replied. I appreciate the help. One think though, I read an article recently re Census in England that said that the Census information for the address was the people who NORMALLY stay their. That could mean that a person could be listed at that address on the night of the Census, but not actually be there. I was initially under the impression that it was only those in the house on the night, but that might not be so. Any thoughts or info?
Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
