Ron,
I generally work from family group sheets when doing research. When other
researchers request information it is the family group sheet that I provide.
Hence, I like to see the citation show where I located the material.
However, thanks for letting me know about the Ancestor Report Footnotes. I
will eventually be printing these reports.
Kay
----- Original Message -----
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Kay,
Repositories do print in Sources, at least in the Ancestor Report footnotes.
They need to be set in Options>Customise>Sources.
Ron Ferguson
_____________________________________________________________________
*New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_____________________________________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:41:44 -0800
Steve,
I have been using the "Book> Editor known> Basic Format" convention you
mention below for lack of anything better. Since the repository won't
print
in the citation (as least I don't believe it will) I like your idea of the
mention in the Comments (ticked to print in the citation).
Thanks!
Kay
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Voght"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I ran into this same problem, and decided the best choice was to
consider such books as "Book> Editor known> Basic Format" and
provide Google Books as the repository (if you don't use the
repository feature, then mention in the Text/Comments where you found
it.) The rationale being that you're looking at an exact digital
image of the original book (including all the relevant publication
information) it's not any different than having a hard copy of that
edition in your own hands and looking at it.
To me, the "online publication only" book category is worthless --
it's not clear what would differentiate a "web book" from a "website"
or other more specific web-based category, especially since it runs
into all the usual problems like getting updated, revised, taken
offline, etc.
Cheers,
Steve
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kay Fordham"
To: "Legacy User Group"
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I've been unable to locate a template for, say, a book with editor
known (original edition) and digitized online at Google Books. The
only online for this scenario is for online publication only (no hard
copies printed). Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks
Kay Fordham
Researching Albrecht, Alden, Baker, DeLoye, DuBois, Fadden, Hanno,
Immel, Kelly, Meves, Roberts, Seel, Spencer, Seeton, Stoddart/Stoddard
_________________________________________________________________
See the most popular videos on the web
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454061/direct/01/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
