1familytree wrote:
Gene,
I was going to let all this pass, but I will refrain from typing what I
am thinking.
I guess my original post was not as explanatory as it should have been.
You are correct, you should have been more clear and accurate in your
statements. In your original post you indicated that you updated the
Legacy geodatabase. It still has nothing to do with Legacy. It is not
a Legacy add on or affiliate. Perhaps in the future you will clearly
state what you mean.
--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer & Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.ripway.com/egptech/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
