On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 16:33:38 -0600, James Cook <jc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bummer on the URLs. I have not considered this, but do see the risks >as you've said. The whole URL makes the citations really ugly though. > I'll have to think on this and see if I can address the issue but >keep cleaner (IMHO) citations. Put the URL in the comments of the source detail. You don't have to display it in reports. *** I would be leery of using URLs *EXCEPT* for my own personal reference. Websites often re-arrange things ... making a saved URL invalid. I run across this same situation when I run my browser bookmarks thru a program which validates them. I do this once a year and regularly find about 5% are bad. YMMV -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
