Thanks all, good stuff so far. Richard - Why no source, every story would have at least a personal reference, even if that is you, right?
Dawn - I have not heard of TheJournal, but will check it out. Rita - Yes, Note is obvious, but some cons is that all notes are contained there with a big long string of source citation references. My thinking this may not be as clean as I'd like. Of course, using Events may have cons as well, for instance I'd probably only want these special events to show on narrative reports, not FGS. I'll have to play with both ideas and see. Jenny - I don't understand "because one might have numerous notes, each with a different Source, I indicate briefly alongside the note which one is relevant" means. Which one *what* is relevant? Isn't that what the superscript source citations numbers do, tell you which source is relevant? Lional & Dawn - What does "make the narrative less bitty" mean? I am thinking one would want this sort of writeup to be included in the narrative of the report *somewhere*, and not buried in the source citations. I also have these sorts of stories to include, and have not found a way to include them. Attaching as events to individuals does not sound right to me. In the publishing center, there is an option to include a custom text page (not sure what it's called exactly, it's not in front of me right now). That might work for this, but could only be included *between* reports and not embedded within say a descendant narrative. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
